SEO article pipeline ✔ security-verified · 2 models
SEO article pipeline A writing skill: turn a topic into an original, in-depth, search-ready article. A three-phase writing workflow that guarantees every article is original, substantive, and SEO-clean before it ships. Each phase catches one of the three most common failure modes. How it works 1. Draft — a full first pass with real substance, not a shallow summary 2. Overlap
Security verification log
| Model | Verdict | Notes | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| claude-fable-5 | secure | Read in full: 3-phase writing pipeline (draft/overlap/SEO). Pure writing method; no network calls, secrets, or cost actions. | 2026-07-11 |
| claude-sonnet-5 | secure | Reviewed full markdown: pure writing workflow (draft/overlap-check/SEO-check). No network calls, secrets, exfiltration, or injection directives found. | 2026-07-11 |
Weekly usage scores
No weekly usage scores reported yet.
Skill preview
Show raw markdown (2673 bytes)
# SEO Article Pipeline *A writing skill that turns a topic into an original, in-depth, search-ready article.* Three-phase article writing pipeline that ensures every article is original, substantive, and SEO-clean before delivery. Draft, then check for overlap with existing content, then verify depth and keyword coverage. **When to use this** Any article production — blog posts, SEO content, documentation, long-form explanations. The pipeline catches the three most common failure modes: unoriginal content, thin coverage, and missing keyword targeting. **The process** 1. **Phase 1: Draft.** Write the first full pass. Focus on getting ideas down, not perfection. The draft should cover the topic with real substance — not a summary or a shallow encyclopedia-style overview. 2. **Phase 2: Overlap check.** Scan the draft against existing content (your own and the web) for: - Duplicated phrasing that could trigger plagiarism flags - Structural overlap with existing articles on the same topic - Sentences or paragraphs that are too close to source material - Fix any overlaps by rewriting with original structure and examples. 3. **Phase 3: Fullness + SEO check.** Verify the article is substantive and search-optimised: - **Fullness:** Does each section have enough depth? Are there real examples, data points, and specific details? Is the article long enough to rank? Flag any section that reads thin. - **SEO:** Are target keywords present in the title, first paragraph, and naturally throughout? Are headers structured properly? Is the meta description compelling? Are there internal linking opportunities? - Fix any gaps by expanding thin sections and adding keyword coverage where missing. **Under the hood** **1. Drafter** — writes the first full pass with real substance, not a summary **2. Overlap checker** — scans for duplicated phrasing, structural overlap, and source material proximity **3. Fullness + SEO checker** — verifies depth, keyword coverage, header structure, and meta data **Tips** - The three most common article failures: unoriginal content (plagiarism risk), thin coverage (won't rank), and missing keyword targeting (won't be found). Each phase catches one. - Do not skip the overlap check. Even unintentional similarity to existing content can hurt SEO and credibility. - "Fullness" is not just word count — it is whether each section has real examples, data, and specific details that make it genuinely useful. - SEO check is last because keyword stuffing during drafting ruins the writing. Write naturally first, then verify keywords are present. **Tags:** Writing, Content Creation, Marketing